Global Index Score
36.21
Oman's index score lands +4.1 against the Middle East average (32.1) and -15.9 against High income peers (52.1). It scores ahead of 54% of the 135 economies assessed this edition. The profile rests on 15 documented evidence items spanning policy frameworks, government initiatives and civil society activity.
GIRAI evaluates countries across five core dimensions that capture the social, ethical, and institutional impacts of artificial intelligence.
AI Policy
34.68
Avrg. Score
26.13
Enabling Conditions
49.16
Avrg. Score
52.95
Civil Society Engagement
6.50
Avrg. Score
13.39
44.87
Index Score
32.56
Avrg. Dimension score
Oman runs +12.3 against the regional average (32.6) on Inclusion and Diversity. Strongest indicators: Cultural and Linguistic Diversity (70.5), Gender Equality (57.6). Weakest: Children's Rights (54.5). This dimension ranks 42nd globally — ahead of the country's overall position (62nd). 4 evidence items on file, including "Omani Language Model Maeen".
38.61
Index Score
31.58
Avrg. Dimension score
Oman runs +7.0 against the regional average (31.6) on Ethics and Sustainability. Strongest indicators: Fairness and Non-discrimination (70.5), Transparency and Explainability (60.6). Weakest: Environmental Impact (0.0), Human Oversight and Determination (57.6). This dimension ranks 59th globally — ahead of the country's overall position (62nd). 4 evidence items on file, including "National Committee of AI".
16.40
Index Score
34.73
Avrg. Dimension score
Oman runs -18.3 against the regional average (34.7) on Labour and Skills. Strongest indicators: Labour Protections (0.0), Reskilling/Upskilling Initiatives (0.0). Weakest: AI Literacy (0.0). This dimension ranks 110th globally — behind the country's overall position (62nd). No dimension-specific evidence items are on file.
43.55
Index Score
36.90
Avrg. Dimension score
Oman runs +6.7 against the regional average (36.9) on Trust and Safety. Strongest indicators: Safety and Security (69.9), Impact Assessments (58.3). Weakest: AI-facilitated Misinformation and Violence (0.0), Access to Redress and Remedy (0.0). This dimension ranks 50th globally — ahead of the country's overall position (62nd). 3 evidence items on file, including "National Committee of AI".
37.59
Index Score
28.75
Avrg. Dimension score
Oman runs +8.8 against the regional average (28.7) on AI Use in Public Service. Strongest indicators: Public Procurement (68.2), Public Sector Skills Development (31.8). Weakest: Public Disclosure of Government Algorithmic Systems (0.0). This dimension ranks 44th globally — ahead of the country's overall position (62nd). 4 evidence items on file, including "Executive Program for Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Technologies" and 1 other documented items.
Explore how country performance, scores, and governance indicators have changed between GIRAI editions.
14 indicators
| Indicator | 2024 Edition | 2026 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Gender Equality | No Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Children's Rights | Binding Framework | Binding Framework |
| Cultural and Linguistic Diversity | No Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Fairness and Non-discrimination | Non-Binding Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Transparency and Explainability | Non-Binding Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Human Oversight and Determination | No Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Labour Protections | No Framework | No Framework |
| Reskilling/Upskilling Initiatives | No Framework | No Framework |
| Safety and Security | No Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Access to Redress and Remedy | No Framework | No Framework |
| Impact Assessments | No Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Public Sector Skills Development | No Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Public Procurement | Non-Binding Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Government Mechanisms for CSO Inclusion in AI Policy and Governance | Non-Binding Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
Indicator definitions changed between editions; this table compares evidence presence and status, not directly comparable scores. A — indicates the item is not applicable or was not assessed for that edition.
Explore how countries and regions perform across GIRAI's governance dimensions, scores, and structural indicators.
| Indicator | Oman | Middle East |
|---|---|---|
| Inclusion and Diversity7 | ||
APGender Equality | 57.6 | 25.2 |
APChildren's Rights | 54.5 | 15.8 |
APCultural and Linguistic Diversity | 70.5 | 30.0 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Inclusion and Diversity | 0.0 | 10.8 |
ECEgalitarian Democracy | 19.1 | 22.4 |
ECSocioeconomic Inclusion in Connectivity | 56.3 | 62.7 |
ECGender Inclusion in Connectivity | 8.2 | 87.7 |
| Ethics and Sustainability6 | ||
APFairness and Non-discrimination | 70.5 | 36.3 |
APTransparency and Explainability | 60.6 | 41.0 |
APHuman Oversight and Determination | 57.6 | 36.7 |
APEnvironmental Impact | 0.0 | 13.7 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Ethics and Sustainability | 0.0 | 16.9 |
ECEnvironmental Performance | 4.9 | 16.6 |
| Labour and Skills6 | ||
APLabour Protections | 0.0 | 6.3 |
APReskilling/Upskilling Initiatives | 0.0 | 49.4 |
APAI Literacy | 0.0 | 29.8 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Labour and Skills | 0.0 | 11.3 |
ECLabour Rights | 27.2 | 28.1 |
ECPopulation Digital Readiness | 82.1 | 82.0 |
| Trust and Safety11 | ||
APSafety and Security | 69.9 | 38.2 |
APAccess to Redress and Remedy | 0.0 | 22.0 |
APImpact Assessments | 58.3 | 35.7 |
APAI-facilitated Misinformation and Violence | 0.0 | 12.0 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Trust and Safety | 0.0 | 8.4 |
ECData Protection and Privacy | 58.4 | 53.7 |
ECData Sharing and Access | 87.5 | 57.5 |
ECConsumer Protection | 84.5 | 80.2 |
ECCybersecurity | 96.8 | 80.9 |
ECRule of Law | 63.9 | 55.1 |
ECGlobal Peace | 78.0 | 59.2 |
| AI Use in Public Service7 | ||
APPublic Sector Skills Development | 31.8 | 37.5 |
APPublic Disclosure of Government Algorithmic Systems | 0.0 | 4.1 |
APPublic Procurement | 68.2 | 17.4 |
CSOGovernment Mechanisms for CSO Inclusion in AI Policy and Governance | 32.5 | 19.6 |
ECCivil Society Oversight | 29.5 | 41.0 |
ECPublic Service Delivery | 83.0 | 80.3 |
ECRight to Information | 31.0 | 28.5 |
| Score adjustment | ||
URAIUnacceptable Risk AI Systems | No penalty | ×0.98Regional average |
A breakdown of the structural factors shaping this country's score.
National AI strategies, laws, and oversight mechanisms that establish formal governance structures.
Contribution to overall score
57%
Participation of academia, advocacy groups, and non-state actors in shaping governance and ensuring accountability.
Contribution to overall score
2%
Institutional capacity, rule of law, digital readiness, and labour protections that enable effective governance.
Contribution to overall score
41%
7 pieces of evidence assessed across 15 indicator cases — laws, policies, strategies, and institutional actions in Oman.